Pull An All Nighter Attempt #1: Failed. Ended up taking a 30 minute nap around 4:20am.
So oh my gawd. Just when I was almost able to pull this off I ended up lying on a couch and watch Scrubs which incidentally made me sleepy. I think I'm gonna go slash my wrists now. Slash slash slash. Why isn't it working? Oh no wonder I didn't have a knife, it turns out that I was trying to slash my wrists with this CD cover which incidentally features a pretty young Yo-Yo Ma on the cover with some other pianist which I don't really care about.
I fail at imitating Dr. Cox
Anyway, so now that I'm refreshed, let me pull something out of my head as a point of discussion. I would discuss the Corey case in Narre Warren, but unfortunately half my LJ list comprises of non-Australian people and I really don't feel like explaining the whole story. I could link you to a dozen news article, but I hardly doubt people would read them all.
SO, even though some of you oldies are probably sick of me complaining already. I will rant about musical prodigies. This is more to re-evalute my ideas and to see how far I've progressed in my understanding and reasoning.
So what makes them a prodigy? It seems as though that everyone has to go 'Wow' whenever a young person is able to play a technically difficult piece. And I mean a techincally difficult piece that actually SHOWS it's technically difficult.
And yes, I'm talking about 12 or 13 year olds who can play pieces that have taken me ages to practise because of the technical difficulty associated with the piece.
Maybe I'm jealous, you can say that and it's a point I certainly cannot defend as well because I am indeed slightly jealous that they are able to achieve much more in a shorter time period what has taken me a few years. I've seen my colleagues complain about people who hit their A Mus at the age of 13 on piano or violin, and nowadays it seems like a normal thing.
BUT, could we say it's because the general audience probably doesn't give a shit about the piece itself and would rather admire the fact that some 13 year old can do stuff that looks really fancy and tricky? That's one of the parts that pisses me off.
ALSO, I've seen a Youtube video or two and one thing's lacking in them. Expression and rubato. For example, when you play Haydn (Cello Concerto in C), you play with strength and bravado. Those kids can barely muster the strength Haydn requires. Saint Saens (Concerto No. 1 in A Minor)? Same thing. I remember one had their facial expression so horrible I wanted to stop watching immediately, but I kept watching, seeing if this person could impress me.
There are also some pieces that require a level of maturity such that they just simply cannot be learnt at a young age. Whilst Prokofiev's Cello Sonata in C may not sound all that technically difficult, it requires an understanding of the issues surrounding his life, and people need to be able to reflect their feelings into music. As far as I'm aware, a 13 year old probably couldn't comprehend 'moodiness' enough in order to express it in music. All they would understand is that the music sounds 'dark' and 'shadowy' and that they're supposed to bow the first part heavily.
Maybe I'm an uptight arse who probably has a lot higher opinions on these sort of things, but I won't accept them as musical prodigies, but I WILL accept them as hardworking musicians.
So something IS new. Now that I've opened my mind up to 20th century repertoire, I see how people express their feelings in music. I find it odd that I only realised it late last year, and that before then I've been playing music with probably no feeling inside. Now I can perform Prokofiev and make it sound lovely to my ears when I'm in the appropriate mood.
God I'm such a nerd.
P.S
jigglypuff, I'm going to ready that ensnaring net and tranquilliser dart for the next time you have a mental breakdown ~_~ (but of COURSE I'm only joking *flops wrist* =P)
Oh and
momolovee, no.